image

I don’t like quoting myself, but to demonstrate just how wrong I was I think it’s acceptable:

“Airsoft stuff isn’t ‘like’ RS stuff, so I wish people would cut out the, ‘…it’s like RS!’ nonsense.”

I said that in the introduction to the last HAO rail I reviewed, before proclaiming it a massive victory and hoping it was a harbinger for HAO’s product range as a whole.

Looks like it was.

image

Since then I got hold of HAO’s ‘G-style’ 14.5″ HK416 Super Modular Rail (SMR) in Desert Dirt Colour (DDC).

I’ve had to try really, really hard to find the differences between it and the RS.

So, this is the executive briefing if you don’t fancy a long read:

HAO’s HK416 SMR is the very best airsoft reproduction rail I have ever seen.

It is, quite literally, “…like RS!”

For those of you who don’t just like pictures, please read on…

IMG_2892

The rail arrived promptly, with lashings of HAO’s excellent customer service. Thanks Bismarck HAO – and nice packaging!

Don’t let the colour in the pics below deceive you. It’s quite hard to get a good handle on the tone, but it’s not salmon pink nor bright copper like some clone rails.

Remember the carrot orange of the original FDE Madbull RIS II? It’s nothing like that.

imageimage

The tone of HAO’s SMR almost exhibits the richness and depth of an RS FDE RIS II. It certainly seems consistent with the RS DDC SMRs I’ve seen.

Basically, it’s brown. Anodised brown – not painted. Like the RS.

Aesthetics aside, one of the things I was really interested in was how well the HAO fits my SGT 416.

In the pic above, HAO is left (DDC) and RS is right (black).

The way the RS SMR’s tongue fits into the upper receiver’s groove isn’t quite as snug as you’d expect.

This has been explained to me as an allowance for thermal expansion (hot barrel, rail made of 6061 and receiver made of 7075).

imageimage

image

The HAO’s tongue is actually more pleasingly finished than the RS. It’s more angular. But, the rail tongue to upper receiver groove fit is minutely less snug than the RS.

So make sure the HAO’s retaining cross-bolt is really tight. You have to do this with the RS, in fairness.

image

Similarly, the HAO isn’t as snug a fit on the SGT’s barrel nut as the RS SMR is. But, it’s within acceptable tolerances.  It actually makes removing and replacing the rail slightly easier.

Like HAO’s 416 Quad Rail, when you push its SMR to the limit on the barrel nut, you don’t have to adjust its position to lock the retaining cross-bolt in place. This shows incredibly close tolerances (even the RS sometimes takes a bit of cross-bolt wriggling).

So lets look at that retaining cross bolt. RS left, HAO right:

image

HAO left, RS right:

image

You have to look really closely to notice any difference at all.

However, I don’t recommend that you remove HAO’s retaining cross-bolt completely. When I did this, the detente which stops the bolt falling out sprang out and I lost the spring and a small pin under the decking.

The RS has a similar detente system, but this appears to be captive within the rail. So no chance of losing the detente.

You can see how seamlessly the edge of the RIS on HAO’s 12 O’clock rail meets its counterpart on SGT’s 416 upper.

Absolutely perfect:

image

Check out some more comparisons with the RS, below. The contours are almost perfect and even the CNC ‘woodgrain’ has been faithfully translated.

Some of the pics are side by side comparisons, others are mirrored (e.g. left side of one compared to right side of the other, to check general symmetry).

imageimageimageimageimageimageimage

I don’t have access to a 14.5″ RS SMR right now, but I did notice that HAO’s provision for its modular rail sections extends further back than my RS 10.5″. See the aft screw hole?

image

I’m told this is true to the RS 14.5″. It will be really useful to me, because I have a short reach (T-Rex arms).

Another tiny detail – the recess for the rear of the cross-bolt detente is a different shape:

image

But, yes – I’m really, really pushing it in terms of looking for differences when this rail is 99.9% there.

Incidentally, I learned something quite interesting about HAO’s QD sling swivel points. First, I checked to see if they’re rotation limited, like the RS. They are. And they have decent, chunky inserts like the RS:

image

However, the insertion and removal of an RS QD sling swivel is a little on the tight side. This doesn’t effect the retention of the RS QD swivel, or its rotation limited movement once in place; but I was curious to know why it was that little bit tighter.

It seemed to have been designed that way – but why?

Bismarck HAO had this to say:

“We enhanced the QD slot to include the tolerances of airsoft QD sling swivels.”

13010204_1575845402728222_256742305_o

“We inserted an additional vertical angle, which works with both RS swivels and airsoft ones.

Better tight then to fall off.”

I totally agree and this goes to show just how thoroughly HAO thinks thing through.

Lastly, something I almost forgot…

When you start amassing US spec RS bits and pieces, you soon realise you need a set of imperial tools as opposed to the more usual (and logical) metric ones.

People often send pics to me, asking if they think what they’ve bought or what they’re about to buy off a forum is really RS.

My advice is, if its US spec RS, check the hex bolts. They should require imperial allen keys.

So, back to the HAO and unlike the RS SMR, the hex bolts for the modular accessory rails are metric, not imperial.

However, you do get exactly the same accessory pack of two short modular rails and one long one. The hex bolts provided work nicely in HAO’s steel screw inserts, exactly the same way as the RS ones do on the original.

Again, you can see the lengths I have to go to in comparing HAO’s masterpiece to the RS!

So, I’ll end as I started:

HAO’s HK416 SMR is the very best airsoft reproduction rail I have ever seen.

It is, quite literally, “…like RS!”

image